44 Liquormart Inc. v. Rhode Island | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued November 1, 1995 Decided May 13, 1996 | |
Full case name | 44 Liquormart, Inc. and Peoples Super Liquor Stores, inc., petitioners v. Rhode Island and Rhode Island Liquor Stores Association |
Docket no. | 94-1140 |
Citations | 517 U.S. 484 (more) 116 S. Ct. 1495; 134 L. Ed. 2d 711 |
Case history | |
Prior | 829 F. Supp. 543 (D.R.I. 1993), reversed 39 F.3d 5 (1st Cir. 1994), cert. granted, 517 U.S. 484 (1996). |
Holding | |
The State of Rhode Island violated the First Amendment rights of the petitioners, and the Twenty-first Amendment does not lessen the state's obligation to abide by constitutional provisions beyond the dormant commerce clause. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stevens, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg (parts I, II, VII); Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg (part VIII) |
Plurality | Stevens (parts III, V), joined by Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg |
Plurality | Stevens (part VI), joined by Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg |
Plurality | Stevens (part IV), joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg |
Concurrence | Scalia |
Concurrence | Thomas |
Concurrence | O'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, Souter, Breyer |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV, XXI |
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a complete ban on the advertising of alcohol prices was unconstitutional under the First Amendment, and that the Twenty-first Amendment, empowering the states to regulate alcohol, did not lessen other constitutional restraints of state power.