Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued March 30, 2016 Decided May 31, 2016 | |
Full case name | United States Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc., et al. |
Docket no. | 15–290 |
Citations | 578 U.S. ___ (more) 136 S. Ct. 1807; 195 L. Ed. 2d 77 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Case history | |
Prior | Motion to dismiss granted, 963 F. Supp. 2d 868 (D. Minn. 2013); reversed, 782 F.3d 994 (8th Cir. 2015); cert. granted, 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015). |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Roberts, joined by Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Concurrence | Kennedy, joined by Thomas, Alito |
Concurrence | Kagan |
Concurrence | Ginsburg (in part) |
Laws applied | |
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 704 |
Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Clean Water Act jurisdictional determination issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers is reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act because jurisdictional determinations constitute "final agency action".[1] For a federal agency decision or action to be reviewable in court under the Administrative Procedures Act, it must be a “final” agency action, meaning that there are no further steps that can be taken before it has an impact on the legal rights or obligations of any affected parties.