An attachment theory is a psychological and evolutionary theory concerning relationships between humans. The most important tenet is that young children need to develop a relationship, with at least one primary caregiver, for their survival, and to develop healthy social and emotional functioning. The theory was formulated by psychiatrist and psychoanalyst John Bowlby (1907–90).[1][2]
Within attachment theory, infant behavior associated with attachment is primarily the seeking of proximity to an attachment figure in stressful situations.[2][3] Infants become attached to adults who are sensitive and responsive in social interactions with them, and who remain as consistent caregivers for some months, during the period six months to two years of age. During the latter part of this, children begin to use attachment figures, as a secure base to explore from and return to. Parental responses lead to the development of patterns of attachment. These, in turn, lead to internal working models that will guide the individual's feelings, thoughts, and expectations in later relationships.[4] Separation anxiety or grief following the loss of an attachment figure is considered to be a normal and adaptive response for an attached infant. These behaviors may have evolved because they increase the probability of survival.[5]
Research by developmental psychologist Mary Ainsworth in the 1960s and '70s underpinned basic concepts and topics relative to maternal responsiveness and sensitivity to infant distress.[6] She introduced the concept of the "secure base" and developed a theory of attachment patterns in infants: secure attachment, avoidant attachment, and anxious attachment.[7] A fourth pattern, disorganized attachment, was identified later. In the 1980s, the theory was extended to attachment in adults.[8] Other interactions may be construed as including components of attachment behavior. These include peer relationships at all ages, romantic and sexual attraction, and responses to the care needs of infants or the sick and the elderly.
To formulate a comprehensive theory of early attachments, Bowlby explored a range of fields, including evolutionary biology, object relations theory, control systems theory, and the fields of ethology and cognitive psychology.[9] After preliminary papers from 1958 onwards, Bowlby published the full theory in the trilogy Attachment and Loss (1969–82). In the early days of the theory, academic psychologists criticized Bowlby, and the psychoanalytic community ostracized him for departure from psychoanalytical doctrines.[10] However, attachment theory has become the dominant approach to understanding early social development and generated a surge of empirical research into the formation of children's close relationships.[11] Criticisms of attachment theory relate to temperament, the complexity of social relationships, and the limitations of discrete patterns for classifications. Attachment theory has been significantly modified as a result of empirical research, but the concepts have become accepted.[10] Attachment theory has formed the basis of new therapies and informed existing ones, and its concepts have been used in the formulation of social and childcare policies, to support early attachment relationships.[12]
Bowlby (1969, 1988) described an attachment as an emotional bond that is characterized by the tendency to seek out and maintain proximity to a specific attachment figure, particularly during times of distress.
Bond is an emotional attachment between one or more individuals. To be considered an attachment bond, the relationship must have four defining characteristics: proximity maintenance, separation distress, safe haven, and secure base.
Rutter 95
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Schaffer
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).BZL
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).