Back Třída CVA-01 Czech CVA-01 Spanish CVA-01-luokka Finnish CVA-01級航空母艦 Japanese CVA-01 Korean Авианосцы типа «Куин Элизабет» (CVA-01) Russian CVA-01 Chinese
.jpg) Official drawing of the CVA-01
| |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Operators |  Royal Navy |
| Preceded by |
|
| Succeeded by | Invincible class |
| Planned | 4 |
| Cancelled | 4 |
| General characteristics | |
| Displacement |
|
| Length | 925 ft (282 m) |
| Beam | 184 ft (56 m) |
| Draught | 33 ft (10 m) |
| Propulsion | 6 Admiralty boilers with 3 Parsons steam turbines providing 135,000 hp (101,000 kW) to three shafts |
| Speed | 30 knots (56 km/h) |
| Range | 7,000 nautical miles (13,000 km) |
| Complement | 3,250 plus airgroup |
| Armament | 1 twin Sea Dart Guided Weapon System 30 launcher, 4 × Sea Cat GWS 20 |
| Armour | unspecified for side and underwater protection |
| Aircraft carried | Up to 50 aircraft, with the planned airgroup having 18 × Phantom FG.1; 18 × Buccaneer S.2; 4 × Gannet AEW.3; 4 × Sea King HAS.1; 2 × Wessex HAS.1 (SAR), probably with 1 × Gannet COD.4 |
| Aviation facilities | 2 catapults (reduced from 4), 2 lifts, 1 hangar 650 ft (200 m) by 80 ft (24 m) |
CVA-01 was a proposed United Kingdom aircraft carrier, designed during the 1960s. The ship was intended to be the first of a class that would replace all of the Royal Navy's carriers, most of which had been designed before or during the Second World War. CVA-01 and CVA-02 were intended to replace HMS Victorious and HMS Ark Royal, while CVA-03 and CVA-04 would have replaced HMS Hermes and HMS Eagle respectively.[1]
The planned four carrier class was soon reduced to three before further being reduced to two and finally, following a government review, in the form of the 1966 Defence White Paper, the project was cancelled, along with the proposed Type 82 destroyer class, which were intended primarily as escorts for carrier groups. Factors contributing to the cancellation of CVA-01 included inter-service rivalries,[2] the huge financial costs of the proposed carrier against ongoing budgetary constraints,[3] and the technical complexity and difficulties it would have presented in construction, operation, and maintenance.[3] Some historians also cite the increased role played by land-based aircraft in providing a nuclear deterrent and that naval leadership at the time presented their need for the carriers poorly in government.[3]
Had CVA-01 and CVA-02 been built, it is likely they would have been named HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Duke of Edinburgh respectively.[4]
- ^ Sturton, I (2014), "CVA01. Portrait of a Missing Link", Warship 2014, London: Conway, p. 30
- ^ Brown, Eric (2007). Wings on my Sleeve. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. pp. 255–257. ISBN 978-0-7538-2209-8.
- ^ a b c Hampshire, Edward (15 April 2016). From East of Suez to the Eastern Atlantic. Routledge. p. 3-4. ISBN 978-1-317-13234-9.
- ^ "British Fleet Carriers". Archived from the original on 15 September 2007.