| Submission declined on 27 August 2024 by Bkissin (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 13 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CFA 19 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 39 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 14 July 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 49 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 June 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Mayors are not inherently notable and must have had significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Routine election coverage is not very helpful. There should be some in-depth coverage of the subject. C F A 💬 01:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Mayors are not sufficiently suitable for a standalone article per WP:NPOL. However, the draft content on the life and children (personal life) isn't sourced. Provide references that meets WP:RS. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I wouldn't deem the coverage sufficient to meet WP:NPOL. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 09:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: See WP:NPOL. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 04:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Eric Feichthaler | |
|---|---|
 | |
| 11th Mayor of Cape Coral | |
| In office April 11, 2005 – November 17, 2008 | |
| Preceded by | Arnold E. Kempe |
| Succeeded by | Jim Burch |
| Personal details | |
| Born | Eric Paul Feichthaler November 29, 1971 Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania |
| Political party | Republican Party |
| Spouse | Mary Roberts Feichthaler |
| Children | 4 |
| Alma mater | University of Miami (B.A.) New York University (LL.M.) |
| Occupation | Politician, attorney-at-law |
| Website | https://www.capecoralattorney.com/attorney/eric-p-feichthaler/ |
Eric Paul Feichthaler (born November 29, 1971) is an American politician and attorney who served as the 11th mayor of Cape Coral, Florida from 2005 to 2008. He won the election at the age of 33..[1].
- ^ "Cape Coral's mayors and council members throughout the years". Aug 14, 2015. Retrieved Jun 5, 2024.