Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,877 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 10 May 2024 by Anuwrites (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 9 May 2024 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Qcne 2 months ago.
|
'Matter' was a Chicago "music magazine" (or more appropriately a punk zine) founded in late 1982 or early 1983. It published 15 issues, one every two to five months, through June 1986. Each issue had from 20 to 40 pages of content, printed on 8-1/2" x 11" heavy, semi-gloss paper, in black and white. Starting with issue 4, the cover had one additional color, always on the front, sometimes on the back advertisement. The entire publication contained about 1000 pieces of editorial content.[1][2][3]
The editor and publisher of all 15 issues was Elizabeth Phillip. Contributors included Steve Albini[4][5], Ira Kaplan, Jim DeRogatis[6], and Glenn Sarvady. Originally out of Evanston, IL, the magazine moved to Hoboken, NJ with issue #10, Sep/Oct. 1984. Until the last issue, the magazine dispensed with page numbers, and none had tables of contents. The focus of the magazine was on current Chicago area, Midwestern, North American, and British music and art that was not in the mainstream.[1][2][3]
In his 2003 book Milk It!, Chicago music critic DeRogatis called Matter an "influential" magazine.[6] Blatch fanzine said "Ultra-pro printing makes Matter stand out like a sore thumb amid the hoards of mags with sloppy, thrown-down layout. .. [It also has] intelligent, multi-opinioned record reviews."[7] Journalist Greg Kot, in his book Ripped: How the Wired Generation Revolutionized Music, wrote that "[f]anzines like .. Matter .. helped introduce a generation to music that wasn't heard on radio, seen on MTV, or written about in Rolling Stone".[8] OP magazine called it a "slick new mag" covering local and regional artists.[9] Musician Bob Mould mentions Matter in his autobigraphy See a Little Light.[10]