Submission declined on 17 January 2025 by WeirdNAnnoyed (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 10 November 2024 by Fancy Refrigerator (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Fancy Refrigerator 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 7 November 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Only one of the sources appears to be independent and secondary, and discussing the subject in a significant way. Others are primary or connected to the subject. Furthermore, the promotional style has not yet been toned down as requested in earlier declines. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Also please remove all external links from the body of the text (see WP:EXTERNAL), the bolds from the headings (see WP:MOS). qcne (talk) 09:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
The NEAT Glass is a type of glassware developed to intensify the tasting experience for spirits by altering the way aromas are perceived. The design, featuring a flared rim and a broad bowl, was developed to direct ethanol vapors away from the nose, allowing for a clearer perception of other aromatic compounds. First introduced in 2012 after extensive research on the impact of glassware shapes on the release of ethanol and aromas, NEAT stands for Naturally Engineered Aroma Technology. It is crafted from lead-free crystal and is utilized primarily in professional tasting environments.[1].
- ^ "That's NEAT! | University of Nevada, Las Vegas". www.unlv.edu. 2012-10-08. Retrieved 2024-11-12.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.