Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Argued March 19, 2002 Decided June 3, 2002 | |
Full case name | Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc. |
Docket no. | 01-408 |
Citations | 535 U.S. 826 (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Case history | |
Prior | 13 F. App'x 961 (Fed. Cir. 2001). |
Questions presented | |
Does the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have appellate jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a claim arising under federal patent law, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim? | |
Holding | |
The Federal Circuit cannot assert jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a patent-law claim, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer; Stevens (Parts I and II-A) |
Concurrence | Stevens (in part and in judgment) |
Concurrence | Ginsburg (in judgment), joined by O'Connor |
Superseded by | |
America Invents Act (2011) |
Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., 535 U.S. 826 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.