Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.

Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.
Argued March 19, 2002
Decided June 3, 2002
Full case nameHolmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.
Docket no.01-408
Citations535 U.S. 826 (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
Prior13 F. App'x 961 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Questions presented
Does the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have appellate jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a claim arising under federal patent law, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim?
Holding
The Federal Circuit cannot assert jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a patent-law claim, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer; Stevens (Parts I and II-A)
ConcurrenceStevens (in part and in judgment)
ConcurrenceGinsburg (in judgment), joined by O'Connor
Superseded by
America Invents Act (2011)

Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., 535 U.S. 826 (2002), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ยท View on Wikipedia

Developed by Tubidy