Keeton v. Hustler Magazine | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued November 8, 1983 Decided March 20, 1984 | |
Full case name | Kathy Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc. |
Citations | 465 U.S. 770 (more) 104 S. Ct. 1473; 79 L. Ed. 2d 790; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 40 |
Case history | |
Prior | 682 F.2d 33 (1st Cir. 1982); cert. granted, 459 U.S. 1169 (1983). |
Holding | |
A state's courts could assert personal jurisdiction over the publisher of a defamatory article, where the publisher circulated the publication in the state where the case was brought, regardless of the plaintiff's home state. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, O’Connor |
Concurrence | Brennan (in judgment) |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 465 U.S. 770 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state could assert personal jurisdiction over the publisher of a national magazine which published an allegedly defamatory article about a resident of another state, and where the magazine had wide circulation in that state.[1]