Martinez v. Ryan

Martinez v. Ryan
Argued October 4, 2011
Decided March 20, 2012
Full case nameLuis Mariano Martinez v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Docket no.10-1001
Citations566 U.S. 1 (more)
132 S. Ct. 1309; 182 L. Ed. 2d 272
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorMartinez v. Schriro, 623 F.3d 731 (9th Cir. 2010)
SubsequentMartinez v. Ryan, 680 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2012)
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan
DissentScalia, joined by Thomas

Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case which considered whether criminal defendants ever have a right to the effective assistance of counsel in collateral state post-conviction proceedings. The Court held that a procedural default will not bar a federal habeas court from hearing ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel if there was no counsel or ineffective counsel in an initial-review collateral proceeding.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ยท View on Wikipedia

Developed by Tubidy