New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued December 6, 1978 Decided March 21, 1979 | |
Full case name | New York City Transit Authority, et al. v. Carla A. Beazer, et al. |
Citations | 440 U.S. 568 (more) 99 S. Ct. 1355; 59 L. Ed. 2d 587; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 77; 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 149; 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) ¶ 9027; 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 73 |
Case history | |
Prior | Beazer v. New York City Transit Authority, 399 F. Supp. 1032 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 558 F.2d 97 (2nd Cir. 1976), cert. granted, 440 U.S. 568 (1978). |
Subsequent | None |
Holding | |
The NYC Transit Authority had a rational basis for its classification of narcotics users and by extension, methadone users. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Stevens, joined by Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist |
Concur/dissent | Powell |
Dissent | Brennan |
Dissent | White, joined by Marshall |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. Amend. XIV, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e |
New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer, 440 U.S. 568 (1979), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the constitutionality of an employer's refusal to hire methadone users was upheld.