Regan v. Wald | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 24, 1984 Decided June 28, 1984 | |
Full case name | Donald Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, et al., Petitioners v. Ruth Wald et al. |
Citations | 468 U.S. 222 (more) 104 S. Ct. 3026; 82 L. Ed. 2d 171 |
Case history | |
Prior | 708 F.2d 794 Ruth Wald, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Donald Regan, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 82-1695 (1st Cir.) |
Holding | |
The restrictions on travel-related transactions with Cuba imposed by the 1982 amendment to Regulation 560 do not violate the freedom to travel protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, White, Stevens, O'Connor |
Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Powell |
Dissent | Powell |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. V, Cuban Assets Control Regulations Trading With the Enemy Act |
Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 majority that restrictions upon travel to Cuba established as part of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations in 1963 did not violate the freedom to travel protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.