This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gun serial number article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 November 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
A fact from Gun serial number appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that a gun serial number can be any random set of numbers letters or a character string?
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I checked it passed time of creation(created 7 days ago at the time of nomination), length, within policy, QPQ passed. I leaved a message for the facts to be cited. (It's my first time to the process, bear with me if there are errors. Feedback are welcomed)xinbenlvTalk, Remember to "ping" me04:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CommentUser:Xinbenlv It's new (apparently I nominated it on the 8th day, but it was subject to an AFD that just got resolved). Substantial compliance. Fixed citations. Provided an additional source. 7&6=thirteen (☎)14:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewed and Looks Good To Me, per comment above, after Norm solves the lack of citation, I think now all criteria are met. By the way, out of the ALTs, I personally like ALT3 the best. (I also like to clarify what I mentioned "Passed time of creation blah blah blah" I meant to say it passes the criteria checks but apparently it was misunderstood, my bad! I think I didn't make myself very clear.)xinbenlvTalk, Remember to "ping" me17:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I came by to promote this. I don't see the ALT3 hook fact mentioned in the article at all. And there is no inline cite for the ALT0 hook fact. If the source is the Michigan guide, that doesn't seem like a great source. It's a handbook, not a book or journal article, and it's also geocentric. Yoninah (talk) 22:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]