![]() | Peter Talbot (bishop) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 24, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Peter Talbot (bishop) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: SkywalkerEccleston (talk · contribs) 08:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: PearlyGigs (talk · contribs) 11:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, SkywalkerEccleston. I'll do this review as one of my "two-for-one". Although I'm a member of WP:GOCE, this is actually my second GA review. I'll do some reading and then come back to you, hopefully soon. Best wishes. PearlyGigs (talk) 11:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I've read the article two or three times and made a few tweaks, as you can see in the page history. It's looking good but, to get my head around the WP:GA process, I just want to see how other reviews are done and how the criteria checks are recorded. I'll then need to consider the citations, though I don't anticipate any problems. The article is certainly well written and within scope. The coverage is wide enough given that there is only limited information about the subject. I'll try and finish this tomorrow. PearlyGigs (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I think this is a good piece of work and so I will promote to WP:GA (need to check the process again, first!). An interesting read. Very well done. PearlyGigs (talk) 19:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you PearlyGigs!
SkywalkerEccleston (talk) 1:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)