Long title | An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018 |
---|---|
Acronyms (colloquial) | TCJA |
Nicknames | Tax Cuts and Jobs Act GOP tax reform Trump tax cuts Cut Cut Cut Act[1] |
Enacted by | the 115th United States Congress |
Effective | January 1, 2018 |
Citations | |
Public law | 115–97 |
Statutes at Large | 131 Stat. 2054 |
Codification | |
Acts affected | Internal Revenue Code of 1986 |
Agencies affected | Internal Revenue Service |
Legislative history | |
| |
United States Supreme Court cases | |
|
The Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018,[2] Pub. L. 115–97 (text) (PDF), is a congressional revenue act of the United States originally introduced in Congress as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA),[3][4] that amended the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The legislation is commonly referred to in media as the Trump tax cuts. Major elements of the changes include reducing tax rates for corporations and high income individuals, increasing the standard deduction and family tax credits, eliminating personal exemptions and making it less beneficial to itemize deductions, limiting deductions for state and local income taxes and property taxes, further limiting the mortgage interest deduction, reducing the alternative minimum tax for individuals and eliminating it for corporations, doubling the estate tax exemption, and reducing the penalty for violating the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to $0.[5][6] The New York Times has described the TCJA as "the most sweeping tax overhaul in decades".[7]
Most of the changes introduced by the bill went into effect on January 1, 2018, and did not affect 2017 taxes.[8] Many tax cut provisions contained in the TCJA, notably including individual income tax cuts, such as the changes to the standard deduction in §63 of the IRC, are scheduled to expire in 2025; while many of the business tax cuts expire in 2028.[9][10] Extending the cuts have caused economists across the political spectrum to worry it would boost inflationary pressures[11][12] and worsen America's 'dire' fiscal trajectory.[13] The Congressional Budget Office estimates that extending the expiring provisions would add $4.6 trillion in deficits over 10 years.[14]
Studies show that the biggest impacts of the TCJA were to increase the federal debt, and after-tax incomes for the most affluent.[15] Impact on GDP growth and wages was less than supporters had expected, and there was an estimated 11% increase in business investment.[16]
Opponents argued that the law would create a higher trade deficit,[17] greater income inequality,[18][19] and reduce healthcare coverage while increasing healthcare costs,[20] and a disproportionate impact on certain states and professions.[21][22] Critics also argued that advocates misrepresented the law.[23][24]
:13
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).:14
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).:15
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).:0
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Vox_Inequality
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).NYT_Kingmakers
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Summers1
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Krugman_Everybody
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).