 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Thanks for the message. I will try to point out a few specific newer books. There were two released this summer (brochures) on science, creation, evolution, that are very nicely written, very detailed and accurate science (I teach middle school science and it helped to fill out my knowledge on DNA). This is also new, "Bearing Thorough Witness" About God's Kingdom (2009), commentary on Acts of the Apostles. I'll put a few more up for you. I appreciated your impartial and honest way of making your point, and so, had agreement with you on the point we were discussing. I don't think JW are the perfect religion, but sincere, and so can be open to honest criticism. At the same time, some overdo it and need to be more balanced. Thanks again. Natural (talk) 17:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Natural
- Go ahead, as long as you source it!Wkharrisjr (talk) 01:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, I did. Also I took your pasting of my original question. I didn't need it lol. Vyselink (talk) 01:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Talk:Dragonlance. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, forgot to do that. Will do in the future. Vyselink (talk) 21:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)