Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Argued October 1, 2018
Decided November 27, 2018
Full case nameWeyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.
Docket no.17-71
Citations586 U.S. ___ (more)
139 S. Ct. 361; 202 L. Ed. 2d 269
Case history
PriorMarkle Interests, LLC v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 40 F. Supp. 3d 744 (E.D. La. 2014); affirmed, 827 F.3d 452 (5th Cir. 2016); rehearing denied, 848 F.3d 635 (5th Cir. 2017); cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 924 (2018).
Questions presented
Whether the Endangered Species Act prohibits designation of private land as unoccupied critical habitat that is neither habitat nor essential to species conservation. Whether an agency decision not to exclude an area from critical habitat because of the economic impact of designation is subject to judicial review.
Holding
An area is eligible for designation as “critical habitat” under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 only if it is habitat for the listed species; and the decision by the secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior not to exclude an area from critical habitat under 16 U. S. C. §1533(b)(2) is subject to judicial review.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinion
MajorityRoberts, joined by Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch
Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Weyerhaeuser Company v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 586 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case. It dealt with the designation of 1544 acres of private land in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana as "critical habitat" for the dusky gopher frog by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.[1][2] In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court vacated the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that upheld the designation and sent the case back for further review.

  1. ^ S. M. (October 1, 2018). "An endangered frog takes centre stage at the Supreme Court". The Economist. Retrieved October 7, 2018.
  2. ^ Heinzerling, Lisa (September 24, 2018). "Argument preview: Justices to consider critical-habitat designation for endangered frog". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved October 7, 2018.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Tubidy