A psicocinese ("movimento mental"), telecinesia[1][2][3][4] ("movimento à distância") ou psi-kappa[5] descreve o suposto fenômeno ou capacidade de uma pessoa movimentar, manipular, abalar ou exercer força sobre um sistema físico sem interação física, apenas usando a mente.[6][7][8] O termo psicocinese foi criado em 1914 pelo autor estadunidense Henry Holt e popularizado pelo parapsicólogo estadunidense J.B. Rhine nos anos 30.[9][10][11][12][13] Já o termo telecinesia foi criado em 1890 pelo parapsicólogo russo Alexandre Aksakof.[14]
Historicamente, tem-se questionado e criticado a telecinesia pelo fato de não ser empiricamente demonstrável, apontando-se como principais falhas a falta de controle e de repetibilidade dos experimentos, dois pilares do método científico. Por consenso na comunidade científica, a telecinesia é tida como uma pseudociência,[15] apesar de ser defendida como autêntica por estudiosos da parapsicologia,[16] ela própria considerada uma pseudociência.[17][18][19][20]
↑Erin McKean, [principal editor]., ed. (8 de abril de 2005). The New Oxford American Dictionary. New York City: Oxford University Press. p. 1367. ISBN978-0-19-517077-1. OCLC123434455. psycho. comb. form relating to the mind or psychology: . . . from Greek psukhe breath, soul, mind.
↑Holt, Henry (1914). On the Cosmic Relations(PDF). Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Houghton Mifflin Company / Riverside Press. Consultado em 13 de dezembro de 2007
↑Psychokinesis. William James Bookstore (online). Página visitada em 06/09/2014.
↑Myers, Frederic William Henry (December 1890). Proceedings. London, England: Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. "For the alleged movements without contact... M. Aksakof's new word 'telekinetic' seems to me the best attainable." Nota: está citação também pode ser vista na pág. 722 ido "Oxford English Dictionary, 2ª edição", 1989, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, ISBN 978-0-19-861229-2
Bunge, Mario (1983). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 6: Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Springer. p. 226. "Despite being several thousand years old, and having attracted a large number of researchers over the past hundred years, we owe no single firm finding to parapsychology: no hard data on telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, or psychokinesis."
Vyse, Stuart (2000). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 129. ISBN9780195136340. Consultado em 11 de dezembro de 2015. [M]ost scientists, both psychologists and physicists, agree that it has yet to be convincingly demonstrated.
Sternberg, Robert J.; Roediger III, Henry J.; Halpern, Diane F. (2007). Critical Thinking in Psychology 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 216–231. ISBN9780521608343. Consultado em 11 de dezembro de 2015
Harold E. Puthoff, "Report on Investigations Into 'Exceptional Human Body Function' in the People's Republic of China," in W. G. Roll, J. Beloff & R. White (eds.), Research in Parapsychology 1982. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow press, 1983. pp. 275-278.
Chinese Academy of Sciences, "Exceptional Human Body Radiation," Psi Research, 1(2), 1982, 16-25.
Carroll B. Nash, "Test of Psychokinetic Control of Bacterial Mutation," Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 78, 1984, 145-152.
Helmut Schmidt, Robert L. Morris & Luther Rudolph. "Chaneling Evidence for a PK Effect to Independent Observers," Journal of Parapsychology, 1986, 50, 1-16
Robert G. Jahn, Brenda J. Dunne & Roger D. Nelson, "Engineering Anomalies Research," Journal of Scientific Exploration, 1(1), 1987, 21-50
J. E. Alcock. A Comprehensive Review of Major Empirical Studies in Parapsychology Involving Random Event Generators or Remote Viewing. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.
Roger D. Nelson, G. John Bradish & York H. Dobyns, Random Event Generator Qualification, Calibration, and Analysis. Technical Note PEAR 89001. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University School of Engineering/Applied Sciences, 1989.
DI Radin and RD Nelson. Evidence for consciousness-related anomalies in random physical sistems. Foundations of Physics 19 :12 (1989), 1499–1514.
Brenda J. Dunne, Robert G. Jahn. Consciousness and Anomalous Physical Phenomena (1995). Technical Note 95004, Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Princeton University. of the Subjective.
↑Gross, Paul R; Levitt, Norman; Lewis, Martin W (1996), The Flight from Science and Reason, ISBN978-0801856761, New York Academy of Sciences, p. 565, The overwhelming majority of scientists consider parapsychology, by whatever name, to be pseudoscience.
↑Friedlander, Michael W (1998), At the Fringes of Science, ISBN0-8133-2200-6, Westview Press, p. 119, Parapsychology has failed to gain general scientific acceptance even for its improved methods and claimed successes, and it is still treated with a lopsided ambivalence among the scientific community. Most scientists write it off as pseudoscience unworthy of their time.
↑Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten (2013), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, ISBN978-0-226-05196-3, University Of Chicago Press, p. 158, Many observers refer to the field as a 'pseudoscience'. When mainstream scientists say that the field of parapsychology is not scientific, they mean that no satisfying naturalistic cause-and-effect explanation for these supposed effects has yet been proposed and that the field's experiments cannot be consistently replicated.